Zee alleges continued use of its copyrighted music despite Delhi High Court injunction; JioStar asked to respond

New Delhi, Sept 2026 : Zee Entertainment Enterprises has approached the Delhi High Court seeking contempt proceedings against JioStar, alleging that the Reliance-Disney joint venture continued to use Zee’s copyrighted music and songs despite a court order restraining such use, according to a legal filing

In its September 21 filing, Zee alleged that JioStar had committed “wilful disobedience” by continuing to use its copyrighted works in programmes broadcast on its platforms despite the court’s injunction

The dispute was taken up by the Delhi High Court on Friday. According to a person familiar with the proceedings, the court sought JioStar’s response to Zee’s latest allegations and listed the matter for further hearing in December

JioStar, which was formed following the $8.5-billion merger of Reliance and Disney’s Indian media assets in 2024, has not publicly commented on the latest allegations. Zee also did not immediately respond to requests for comment

The copyright dispute dates back to April, when Zee sought $3 million in damages from JioStar, alleging around 50 instances of copyright infringement involving works owned by its music division

In May, the Delhi High Court directed JioStar not to “use, publish, broadcast, stream, upload” any of Zee’s licensed works. The order followed Zee’s allegations concerning the continued use of its copyrighted content after the expiry of licensing arrangements

JioStar’s lawyers had previously told the court that the alleged infringements were “unintentional” and “purely residual in nature”. The company had also informed the court in May that it had removed a substantial amount of Zee’s content following the expiration of the relevant licensing agreements

In its latest filing, Zee has cited six instances between May and July that it says demonstrate continued use of its copyrighted works by JioStar. Zee alleged that the company was “illegally and actively exploiting” its copyrighted material and sought action over the alleged violation of the court’s order